Same Service Marriage: Two Alarm Merger?
By · CommentsThe playas at Lakewood fire are at it again, macking another community with that sweet, sweet talk of merger, or is it consolidation, or is it any other line they will use to get into the taxpayer’s pants (pocket, that is). They figure who can resist their big, strong fire service. This time they are using their one handed unclasping maneuver to expose the bountiful resources of their neighbor to the north, University Place. I guess they feel they had no other choice when they discovered that their neighbor to the south wouldn’t put out after a two year courtship. Of course, they were not content to remain “just” friends and soothed their ego elsewhere.

Whoa, who can resist those bountiful tax bases?
Here is the reprint of the article that appeared this past week in the Tacoma News Tribune:
BRENT CHAMPACO; Staff writer
Published: 02/04/1012:05 am | Updated: 02/04/1012:18 pm
University Place and Lakewood fire officials say merging the two districts makes financial sense. Some residents support the move, while others doubt whether their tax dollars would be spent wisely.
About 60 people attended a University Place Fire District 3 board meeting Tuesday night to discuss a proposed merger.
“I firmly believe this is a good deal for Lakewood; I do not believe this is a good deal for University Place.” said Scott Stephen, a UP resident who questioned whether his city needs the same full-time specialty services as its big-city neighbor.
Bill Bush, UP’s former fire chief, said the two districts have common interests. He said that wasn’t necessarily the case in the 1990s, when other merger attempts failed.
“As far as a ‘them-us’ mentality – please. We’ve been down that road before, and it serves no purpose,” he said.
After a yearlong study, the Lakewood Fire District 2 Board of Commissioners voted in January to pursue a merger. The two districts border each other in the west end of Pierce County.
Lakewood would dissolve its fire district and merge into University Place’s, which would be known locally as West Pierce Fire & Rescue. It would be governed by a single board, which initially would be composed of the merged boards.
The UP district’s board is now considering the merger and is scheduled to vote on it by early March. If the commissioners support it, then Lakewood residents, not UP’s, would vote as early as next year.
On Tuesday, chiefs of both districts – Mitch Sagers of UP and Ken Sharp of Lakewood – said a merger would be good for both communities.
The districts could pool their resources, including firetrucks, training facilities and experts, they said. Lakewood also would provide services that UP doesn’t have, such as a marine unit, which could be helpful when Pierce County opens two miles of beach at Chambers Creek Properties.
Sharp said the change would result in almost $1 million in savings to taxpayers. This year, Lakewood residents paid almost $3 per $1,000 assessed property value for fire and EMS protection, while UP residents paid $2.86 per $1,000.
Sagers said mergers – or “regionalization,” in firefighter talk – has been a trend throughout the South Sound; there were 32 fire districts or departments in 1990, compared with 21 last year.
The number could shrink by one more if voters approve merging the Edgewood Fire Department with East Pierce Fire & Rescue on Tuesday.
“All things considered, the merger is a sensible move,” Sagers said, quoting a consultant’s report from October 2009.
But some residents who spoke Tuesday didn’t agree.
Michael Holman was one of the people who pushed for University Place to become a city in 1995. He said locals wanted more autonomy of their government and tax dollars.
They would be giving up some of that power under a merger, he said.
“The fact of the matter is, you would shift control,” he said, pointing to the UP fire commissioners.
But Dixie Harris, who is active on the UP scene, said she trusts that the fire district knows what it needs to be successful.
“I can’t help but believe their decisions are in the best interests” of both cities, she said.
Brent Champaco: 253-597-8653
brent.champaco@thenewstribune.com
Same dance, different song. Here is the twist: Lakewood would dissolve its fire district in order to merge into the U.P. district. The hope is to form a power couple, and maybe it will work; it isn’t like these are opposites attracting, as was the case with DuPont.

It will be interesting to see if DuPont behaves like a jilted lover. After all, the DuPont Washington voters left Pierce County Fire District 2 at the altar in two elections in a span of five months just about a year ago. Lakewood has moved on and they are hoping that doing well is the best revenge. Perhaps they will now that they appear to have found a better fit.
Scat in the Hat
By · CommentsGreat minds think alike? Or, something like that, because it seems some folks in North Seattle also have dog excrement on their brains. In today’s edition of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer there is a featured blog post on dog owners who don’t pick up.
You can read the story in its entirety here, but I would like to share a featured video in the name of “public education.” Perhaps the mayor would like to add this link to the city website, since she is so keen on the concept of teaching doggie doodie scofflaws how to fish; assuming it will motivate them to address their dog’s steaming pile.
Take time to read the post since it helps you feel that you are not alone with this concern. Particularly, take note of the comments left on the North Seattle post. Besides, it is good exercise to throw your hands up in exasperation.
Alpha Dog
By · CommentsNow that it is clear that the city plans on holding yet another retreat, in the name of efficiency and generally getting along, I thought I should offer up a suggestion on potential areas they could concentrate on for the year 2010.
This year I would like to see the City Council and Mayor Jenkins work on something not inherently obvious to them (by definition). The need to understand subtext.
Subtext is defined by Merriam-Webster as the implicit or metaphorical meaning (as of a literary text). You may recognize it more readily as a device used in television and film. It is often referred to as the story within the story.
For example, you may remember the popular advertising campaign where the fastidious grocer named Mr. Whipple implored the patrons not to squeeze the Charmin. In this case, he is actually telling the shoppers not to squeeze the toilet tissue.
Squeezing toilet tissue. Who cares? What harm is there in an edifying squeeze? What seemed like the kindly merchant trying to maintain the integrity of the product was really about Mr. Whipple: control freak; and his obsessive quest to maintain order in a world of chaos.
He couldn’t stop the world from changing around him but, dammit, he sure could try to control the homemakers of yore from squeezing the always predominately displayed tissue.
Of course, that is one interpretation of Whipple’s mania. Ultimately, he would always succumb to the sins of the tissue and wantonly squeeze it himself! (the cad) To that end, Mr. Whipple may have had a simple fetish and rather than confront his own base desires he employed transference to the unwitting shoppers. Perhaps the toilet tissue represented the breasts of the women he chose to confront; and in the end, Mr. Whipple always surrendered to his desire.
The last, and perhaps most controversial interpretation of subtext in the Charmin campaign is that Mr. Whipple is actually protecting the women from themselves. There is something virginal about toilet tissue in that state. White purity that is unspoiled but with the realization that it will one day be torn, debased, and ultimately discarded unceremoniously; and once defiled, it can never be made pure again. Stand aside, ladies, your guardian angel Whipple is going to preserve in you what he so desperately wants taken from himself.
And why did they always have to sniff it while squeezing?
Face it, the guy needed therapy.
I have taken the time to painstakingly edit the following video from the January 12, 2010 televised council meeting to illustrate an example of subtext and how it eludes most of those in attendance. Watch carefully, you should find yourself mired in the same frustration as the citizen speaker.
The untrained observer might conclude that this citizen was complaining about the general rudeness of people who carelessly, or purposely, allow their pets to use his yard as a toilet. Living on a corner lot next to a public trail, I can sympathize. However, there appears to be another theme at play.
I sense a citizen who is frustrated with the city and what he perceives as a lack of acknowledgement and, ultimately, lack of action.
First he begins with a simple email but it escalates to having to take the time to travel to city hall and address the council and mayor personally. What is his treatment? He is facing scorn and inquiry in a semantic battle over what a response is. In Councilman Ehrenreich’s opinion it is a return email acknowledging the problem. To Mr. Davita, response appears to be the lack of solution.
Both sides are talking, both sides are listening, but neither side seems to get it.
What the council and mayor do not seem to understand is that “working” on an issue does not necessarily mean that a solution will be the end result. I could rehash recent history to corroborate this point but Mr. Davita did one step better. He laid down his trump card when he asked how many citations the city has written enforcing this ordinance in the past five years.
Touché.
However, most of us will agree that we would rather the police concentrate on activities that are of a greater benefit to the whole of the public.
The confusion is around why would a statute exist if there was no plan to enforce it even in the face of the fact that it is being violated? We see this all the time, cell phone usage comes to mind.
That brings us back to square one in the situation; looking for solutions. Here we hear the coin drop in the mayor’s juke box of “public education” and the proposed “pet socialization area.” Unfortunately, neither holds much hope that the situation will change on Fisher Avenue.
Who knows, maybe this is just my transference of frustration with the city that I am assigning to Mr. Davita. During the same period I was also expecting a response from the city on a matter that went unanswered over a curiously long period of time. A simple information request two months delinquent. In parallel, I watched and waited for the mayor’s response to the July fireworks related fires and deferred mitigation.
Bupkis.
Take heart, Mr. Davita. It isn’t that they can’t hear you. It is just that they can’t seem to answer you.

City of DuPont: Plan 2010
By · CommentsThe Mayor of DuPont has a plan. No, really, she does.
And to prove it the mayor has developed a tracking sheet, or a scorecard, or a Gantt chart, or a calendar! It is also a “living and breathing document” which is very exciting to the mayor.
However, when you hear it read aloud, it becomes another “to do” list. Another agenda to be buried within the city website, if it is there at all.
Part of what makes this list so exciting to the mayor is that she is the one who gets to tick the boxes and grade it as successful; and knowing her aversion to challenging, let alone criticizing her staff, well she can go ahead and place checks everywhere and declare it done!
The ability to grade yourself comes in handy because those pesky opinions of citizens, from either surveys or public comments, don’t get in the way.
That brings up an interesting point since you have to wonder if the “scientific” survey was consulted, ala Ouija board. Mention of working on some historic sites weighs in this Plan 2010 even though citizens were ambivalent, or lukewarm at best, to such matters in the survey.
Nary a word on development. Nothing about a market. But, doggone it; we are going to have a paved trail to the Methodist Mission site!
What did you expect? Addressing the needs and wants of the citizens? Not to worry, there is talk of a “pet socialization area” (off leash dog park) in the plan. Why the mayor insists on using this clumsy phrase is beyond me. Can I socialize my dog with a ferret? How about a snake? Care to watch someone’s dog socializing with someone else’s rabbit?
I suppose Mayor Jenkins is just carrying on in that grand DuPont Washington tradition of trying to use words to overcome the town’s reality.
Paresi Memorial Scheduled for Sunday
By · CommentsThis information has been provided by the Home Town Clipper.
A Celebration of Life Memorial for retired Master Sgt. Dane Clark Paresi will be held on Sunday, January 31, 2010 at Chloe Clark Elementary, located at 1700 Palisade Blvd. in DuPont, Washington. The memorial will begin at 2 p.m. inside the Community Room.
Friends, family, neighbors and colleagues are invited to attend and pay tribute to an American hero.
VanTastic Voyage
By · CommentsAs Americans, we like to remember fondly and promote certain parts of our history. We point to our perseverance in building a nation in the 18th century; our rise from agrarian to industrial power in the 19th century; and our sacrifice during the war years to our struggles to gain civil rights in the 20th century.
To some, we are not introspective or self critical enough. Critics will say we release an official history and package it like any other product. There may be some truth to that analysis but it is hardly the whole truth. We still have the luxury to pick and choose our outrage; whether it is slavery, atrocities against indigenous peoples, or imperialist policies. We look to our collective shame and piously declare slogans such as “Never Forget” or “Not in our Lifetime.”
I propose another slogan: No more.
No more will we turn our backs on perhaps our most pernicious cultural artifacts ofjunk culture.
Junk culture is the box referred to when we are told to think outside of it. The problem is, we don’t even know we are in a box. In fact, the axiom to “think outside of the box” is part of our junk culture, so it is kind of like holding a mirror up to a mirror and seeing to infinity.
A reflection of a reflection.
To that end, I have unearthed a piece of our skewed history. A history discarded because it wasn’t as quaint as the hula hoop but no less important. Thanks to the folks at one of my favorite web blogs, Everything is Terrible!, I was forced to confront the found memory also know as Custom Van Culture.
(That would be vans you drive not Vans you wear)

I came across this clip they mashed up called Supervan (1977).
Where to begin?
Once past the wooden dialog; the George Barris “kreation” of the protagonist Van Dora; the strangely gloomy filming location of Kansas City; the hokey musical interludes; or the inclusion of cinéma vérité during a montage of the individualistic van murals at the “Freak Out” scene; I was left with a mix of emotions, questions, and memories.
At the 1:08 mark I was sad to see a literary hero cavorting at the van rally, or “freak out”, during what appears to be a wet t-shirt contest. The classical music loving booze-hound Charles Bukowski at such a place in history was an assault to the senses, particularly since such vacuous indulgences to “modern” life seems incongruent with his writing. Who am I kidding? I can only conclude that he was lured in by his notorious human weakness for pert breasts and free wine.
I then began to reflect on my (I wish I could say fuzzy) memories of custom vans. The craze had already waned by the time I got my driver’s license, around the time gasoline broke the one dollar per gallon barrier. I do seem to recount that favored colors for these vans seemed to be burnt orange and brown; also know then as “earth tones.” There were port hole windows added with roof vents, and yes, there was plenty of shag carpeting.

Because the custom van was part of the “Me” generation’s celebration of individuality, there wasn’t much of a resale market for these vehicles. That is not to say they some didn’t exchange hands for those with similar thematic interests, or the truly desperate. My neighbor, across the street from the duplex I called home, owned a Star Wars rolling tribute (in very non-outer space evoking brown, Chewbacca Brown, perhaps).
The Death Star on wheels was a Chevy van purchased by a janitor to haul his cleaning gear in style. Surface rust had begun to spoil the mural and one such eruption made it appear that princess Leah was crying a brown tear. This van became a landmark by which I instructed my visitors to locate my address. Since all the war-era houses looked the same (literally) it was easiest to say “Look for the Star Wars van, I am the house across the street.”

I wish I had a photo of that Star Wars van but there is no shortage of them available to us today since it seems to have been one of these two particles on the junk culture super-collider at the time.
Some custom vans had simple motifs, perhaps just festooned with multiple stripes; while others had full murals of complicated scenery. Their interiors were a cross between Greg Brady’s bedroom and Bob Newhart’s psychiatry office.

It is also common that the portions of our culture we hope to forget are regurgitated in time to make a comeback. This may not have happened here, although we did bear the ill begotten fruit known as the mini van, the custom van did re-emerge in Japan. Not to be outdone, the Japanese could not resist taking their homage to American junk culture over the top.
Actually, from the mundane…

…to the outrageous.

These road relics were strangely captivating creatures that demanded attention, much like a car wreck on the side of the road. I used to try to match the mural with the driver and the personality it had hoped to evoke. Mutton Chops and Fu Manchu ’stachs to feathered hair and flair corduroys; these were the freedom loving expressionists of their generation.
Before we snicker too loudly at the ridiculousness of the custom van excesses of the 1970s and chalk it up to the collective need of an era of people’s need at conspicuous self expression, we need to recognize the foundation they have established on our behalf.
From Citizen Band radios to texting while driving; or, dorky air brushed murals to cheesy body art, can we really sit in judgment? What have we learned?




It does make you wonder what we consider commonplace will be deemed a ridiculous phase and what of our current obsessions and expressions will have the staying power to carry it into the future. Will writing a blog, the language of texting shorthand, celebrity Tweets, or Facebook “friends” seem like an unnecessary indulgence or will it endure; if only to rust in a distant field or collect dust in our cluttered cultural basement?
I couldn’t resist adding one last scene from Supervan. Look closely as the cop at the end of this scene is Len Lesser, who played uncle Leo on Seinfeld.
Sequalitchew Trail Closed
By · CommentsFrom the city of DuPont:
A significant slide occurred on Sequalitchew Trail on Saturday, January 16. It was caused by water overflowing a clogged culvert. The slide has removed enough of the trail area to render it unsafe to the public at this time.
The City is contacting the Department of Ecology and Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine if permits are required to make repairs to the slide area. The clogged culvert has been repaired and water is now flowing properly. The City will make repairs to the trail as soon as possible but until further notice the trail is closed to the public. The City will provide frequent updates as new information is available.
The Bandwagon Got Stuck in the Mud
By · CommentsHere is a rerun of the videos addressing the fires we had around the Fourth of July as they appeared at the time of their original post, unedited. If you remember, it was no minor event.
In true DuPont political fashion, the fires were another opportunity to showcase our wonderful cooperative model with Lakewood’s fire department.
The response is set and it is to be decisive, just not prompt. At least that was the plan in July.
Larry Wilcox hopes aboard the Me Too express and speaks passionately about the numerous complaints he heard from his constituents and provides reassurances that something will be done about it.
I guess it just makes me sad that we have been hit over the head for so long now on the importance of our fire service and yet when the citizens voice legitimate concerns over fire safety and our responsibilities then nothing happens.
City of DuPont Council Workshop Agenda – January 2010
By · CommentsIn case anyone thought that I was premature in announcing that the City of DuPont leadership had no intention of honoring their commitment I present to you the published agenda for the next council workshop to be held on Tuesday, January 19, 2010.

You can view the PDF here or a screen capture of the agenda here.
Fireworks Response is a Dud
By · CommentsWe are three weeks into the year 2010 and I am sure many of us are still struggling with our New Year’s resolution. I read somewhere recently that the average amount of time it takes before breaking such foolhardy proclamations is about three weeks.
Really? Are we that soft?
It also prompted me to think of what should be some resolutions that the City of DuPont declares on behalf of serving its citizens for the year twenty-ten. I suspect that someone will comment on what they think the city can do better at for this coming year but I have one I can think of off the top of my head:
Follow through.
Through the luxury of video I can offer up an example of what I am talking about.
Did anything that the mayor stated regarding fireworks happen as promised? I cannot recall any “intense” public education on the matter; not on the city website, not on their facebook page, nor in Bill’s Friday letter.
Thankfully, I do not think that in the pouring rain of December 31st that there was much of an issue with fireworks. But lets be honest, putting off until now the issue of fireworks is nothing but lazy governance. DuPont had two significant fires around the Fourth of July holiday and the city’s solution to this matter was to defer it until January and then ignore it.
Sadly, we have grown accustom to this half ass approach throughout town. Supermarket? Sorry, folks. Loop Road? Maybe next year. New mixed use development around Ross Plaza? Well, here’s the thing…
What is the excuse this time and who will stand up and take responsibility?
Now there is an added wrinkle to the city’s delay on dealing with fireworks. Between then and now something called the “scientifically based, statistically relevant, public outreach, citizen survey” took place. There was also an “online, we don’t really care what you think because couldn’t be bothered to advertise it” survey. The issue of fireworks was not addressed on the $25,000 survey but a question regarding fireworks was asked on the bastard step child online survey. The question was as follows:
Which of the following best expresses your opinion regarding the use of fireworks in the City of DuPont?
The number one response was Fireworks should be banned at all times, 36.8%.
So what should the city do with this data? It was part of the whole package they touted both before the survey and at the town hall meeting discussing the results. Their outreach yielded an answer, it just remains to be seen what the Mayor and Council choose to do with this input. Do they take the results seriously and use it as a guide as they pledged? Or, do they shrug their shoulders in befuddlement and let an unexpected result paralyze them? Or, do they look the data square in the eye and say, “Hey, I am elected and I can do what I see fit. If the people don’t like it then vote me out!”
The councilmember who most vocally supported a ban on fireworks was voted out in November. Does it mean anything? Surely, it cannot be related. No one really brought the matter up during the campaign.
The only thing that can be concluded is that the matter clearly fell off the radar, as so many other issues do in DuPont, Washington. As the video shows, the Mayor was pretty enthusiastic about “intense” training in July, she just couldn’t keep the charade up through Christmas. Sure, other things come up, they always do. Perhaps some planned to insulate some pipes in July. You procrastinate at your own peril.
Well, I guess it is true when it is said: Anyone can go to church on Sunday but it is how you act on Monday that matters.